Monitoring of regulated quarantine forest pests of the Lepidoptera series using traps

А. Borzykh; A. Sikura; V. Gunchak; М. Solomiichuk

doi:10.36495/1606-9773.2020.66.31-44

А. Borzykh Institute of Plant Protection of NAAS, 33, Vasylkivska str., Kyiv, Ukraine, 03022
A. Sikura Ukrainian Research Plant Quarantine Station of the Institute of Plant Protection of NAAS, 1, Naukova str., p. Boyany, Novoselytskyi district, Chernivtsi region, 60321, Ukraine
V. Gunchak Ukrainian Research Plant Quarantine Station of the Institute of Plant Protection of NAAS, 1, Naukova str., p. Boyany, Novoselytskyi district, Chernivtsi region, 60321, Ukraine
М. Solomiichuk Ukrainian Research Plant Quarantine Station of the Institute of Plant Protection of NAAS, 1, Naukova str., p. Boyany, Novoselytskyi district, Chernivtsi region, 60321, Ukraine

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36495/1606-9773.2020.66.31-44

Keywords: quarantine forest pests; Lepidoptera; monitoring; detection; traps; pheromones

Abstract

Goal. On the basis of literature data, select methods for identifying regulated quarantine forest pests using traps with pheromones, attracting baits and without them.

Methods. The study was based on a search in domestic and foreign literary sources, as well as on the Internet, for data on existing methods for identifying regulated forest pests of the Lepidoptera series using traps. After completing the search, an analysis and generalization of scientific and practical literature on instrumental monitoring of regulated forest pests was carried out.

Results. A comprehensive analysis of the literature data showed that the use of traps of various types and configurations is effective to identify quarantine pests of the forest, to which you can add various fillers that can attract a certain type of insect. Pheromone traps trap the target species even if the population is very low. To trap lepidoptera pests, cardboard traps of the «Delta» type, Pherocon®-2, «milk bag» traps and universal traps Uni-traps are used. The use of various traps depends on the biology of the objects under study. For each type of pest, a methodology for the use of traps and the timing of monitoring have been established.

Conclusions. Analysis of literature data showed that when monitoring studied regulated forest pests for their timely detection, the most effective method is the use of traps with appropriate attractants. The use of traps makes it possible to obtain operational information about the presence of pests in a certain area, to determine their number and the need for appropriate protective measures.

References

Lis. Zahalʹni dani. [Forest. General data.]. URL: https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ліс (in Ukrainian).

Hensiruk I. (1990). Istoriya lisnytstva v Ukrayini. [History of forestry in Ukraine]. Lʹviv: Svit. 211 p. (in Ukrainian).

Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations Statistical capacity development. URL: http://www.fao.org/statistics/statistical-capacity-development/en// (in English).

Shabliy O. (1994). Ekonomichna heohrafiya. [Economic geography]. Lʹviv: Svit. 167 р. (in Ukrainian).

Vorontsov A. I., Semenkova I. G. (1980). Lesozashchita. [Forest protection]. Moskva: Lesnaya promyshlennost'. 327 р. (іn Russian).

Pro vnesennya zmin do Pereliku rehulʹovanykh shkidlyvykh orhanizmiv. [About modification of the List of regulated harmful organisms]. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0879-19#Text. (in Ukrainian)

Attract and trap pest insects with pheromone lures and traps. URL: http://www.arbico-organics.com/category/insect-pheromone-lures-traps (in English).

Stelinski L.L., Miller J.R., Gut L.J. (2005). Captures of two leafroller moth species (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in traps baited with varying dosages of pheromone lures or commercial mating-disruption dispensers in untreated and pheromone-treated orchard plots. The Canadian Entomologist. Vol. 137. P. 95—98. (in English).

Davis E.E., French S., Venette R.C. (2005). Mini Risk Assessment. Siberian Silk Moth, Dendrolimus sibiricus Tschetv. (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae). USDA APHIS, PPQ. 22 р. (in English).

Sweeney J.D., McLean J.A., Shepherd R.F. (1990). Factors affecting catch in pheromone traps for monitoring the western spruce budworm, Choristoneura occidentalis Freeman. The Canadian Entomologist. Vol. 122 (6). Р. 1119—1130. (in English).

Evenden M.L., Gries R. (2006). Sex pheromone of the large aspen tortrix, Choristoneura conflictana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Chemoecology. Vol. 6 (2). Р. 115—122. (in English).

Haynes K.F., McLaughlin J., Stamper S. (2007). Pheromone trap. J. Econ. Entomol. Vol. 36 (5). P. 1199—1205. (in English).

Gray T.G., Shepherd R.F., Gries G., Gries R. (1996). Pheromone trap of the western blackheaded budworm, Acleris gloverana Wals. and Acleris variana Fern. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). The Canadian Entomologist. Vol. 128 (6). Р. 1135—1142. (in English).

Development of a сombined sex pheromone-based monitoring system for Malacosoma disstria (Lepidoptera: Lasoicampidae) and Choristoneura conflictana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). URL: https://academic.oup.com/ee/article/38/2/459/526147. (in English).

Delta trap kit for Spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana. URL: http://www.arbico-organics.com/. (in English).

Delisle J. (1992). Monitoring the seasonal male flight activity of Choristoneura rosaceana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in Eastern Canada using virgin females and several different pheromone blends. Environmental Entomology. Vol. 21 (5). Р. 1007—1012. (in English).

Bessin R. Eastern tent caterpillar (Malacosoma americanum Fabr.). URL: https://entomology.ca.uky.edu/files/efpdf2/ef423.pdf. (in English).

Jones B.C., Roland J., Evenden M.L. (2009). Development of a combined sex pheromone based monitoring system for Malacosoma disstria (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae). Environmental Entomology. Vol. 38. P. 459—447. (in English).

Li J.L. (1989). Bionomics of Malacosoma parallela Staudinger and its control. Entomological Knowledge. Vol. 26. Р. 344—346. (in English).