Use of a complex mixture of hyphomycete Lecanicillium lecanii and Bacillus thuringiensis to protect greenhouse crops from sucking pests
Abstract
Goal. To determine the biological effectiveness of working suspensions of hyphomycete Lecanicillium lecanii, bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis var. thuringiensis and their mixture in regulating the number of melon aphids and common spider mites on cucumber culture in closed ground conditions.
Methods. Laboratory and in the experimental greenhouse block. Objects of research: 1) entomopathogenic fungus Lecanicillium lecanii R. Zare & W. Gams (2001), strain CNMN-FE-03, isolated from the natural population of greenhouse whitefly with subsequent selection by passage through the test insect. Three passages through melon aphids and three passages through common spider mites were performed; 2) entomopathogenic bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis var. thuringiensis (Bt) was isolated from a dead larva of the Colorado potato beetle. Target objects are melon aphid Aphis gossypii Glov. and common spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch.
Results. The technical efficiency of the aqueous suspension of hyphomycete L. lecanii at a concentration of 3.5% against melon aphids was 89.9%, against spider mites — 92.7%. The bacterial suspension of B. thuringiensis at a concentration of 5.0% reduced the number of aphids by 89.1%, the number of spider mites — by 91.1%. The technical efficiency of the mixture of suspensions of the fungus L. lecanii at a concentration of 3.5% and the bacterial suspension of B. thuringiensis at a concentration of 5.0% against melon aphids was 91.7%, against spider mites — 93.8%.
Conclusions. As a result of the studies, it was noted that the combined use of two biological insecticidal plant protection products based on the fungus L. lecanii (contact action) and the bacterium B. thuringiensis var. thuringiensis (intestinal action) increases the percentage of common spider mites and melon aphids in closed ground conditions by 1.1—2.7% compared to their use separately.
References
Akhatov A.K., Izhevskiy S.S., Meshkov YU.I., Borisov B.A., Volkov O.G., Chizhov V.N. (2004). Zashchita teplits i teplichnykh rasteniy ot vrediteley. Tovarishchestvo nauchnykh izdaniy KMK, 307 s. (in Russian).
De Faria M.R., Wraight S.P. (2007). Mycoinsecticides and mycoacaricides: a comprehensive list with worldwide coverage and international classification of formulation types. In: Biol. Control, 43(3), 237-256. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.08.001
Jouzani G., Valijanian E., Sharafi R. (2017). Bacillus thuringiensis: a successful insecticide with new environmental features and tidings. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol, 101, 2691-2711. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-017-8175-y
Îndrumări metodice pentru testarea produselor chimice și biologice de protecție a plantelor de dăunători, boli și buruieni în Republica Moldova. (2002). Sub redacția ION LAZARI. Chișinău, «Tipografia Centrală». 286 p. (in Romanian).
Zare R., Gams W. (2001). A revision of Verticillium sect. Prostrata. IV. The genera Lecanicillium and Simplicillium gen. nov. Nova Hedwigia, 73(1), 1-50. doi: 10.1127/nova.hedwigia/71/2001/1
Pavlyushin V.A., Novikova I.I., Boykova I.V. (2020). Mikrobiologicheskaya zashchita rasteniy v tekhnologiyakh fitosanitarnoy optimizatsii agroekosistem: teoriya i praktika (obzor). Sel’skokhozyaystvennaya biologiya, 55(3), 421-438. (In Russian).
Schnepf E., Crickmore N., Van Rie J., Lereclus D., Baum J., Fietelson J., Zeigler D.R., Dean D.H. (1998). Bacillus thringiensis and Its Pesticidal Crystal Proteins. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., 62(3), 775–806. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.62.3.775-806.1998
Lednev G.R., Dolgikh V.V., Pavlyushin V.A. (2013). Strategii parazitizma entomopatogennykh mikroorganizmov i ikh rol’ v snizhenii chislennosti fitofagov. Vestnik zashchity rasteniy. (3), 3-17. (In Russian).

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
ISSN
ISSN 






